|
We developed a Climate Cohort of DVYC; this cohort worked on asset-mapping, story-telling and visioning. They partnered with the City of Seattle to present initial plans for the Duwamish Valley Resilience District, and to gather feedback from community regarding potential Resilience District action items. We also co-hosted a Flood Community Advisory Group in English and Spanish with most-impacted community members to discuss the following: buy-out programs, home elevation, individual assessment plans by flood adaptation contractors, annexation of unincorporated King County, and flood insurance. Neighbors are interested in all of these adaptation efforts. In Winter of 2025 we collaborated on two meetings: one with community-based organizations and one with the Flood Community Advisory Group. In the first meeting, we engaged in discussion about the Reconnect South Park project and possible outcomes that could impact or mitigate climate change. For example, lower volume of cars and freight will lead to improved air conditions and surplus land could be used as a re-introduced flood plain, to absorb and buffer sea level rise. Some members were quite interested in re-purposing some portion of the acreage currently utilized by Highway 99 as a flooding buffer; others less so. The second meeting was with Seattle Public Utilities. Together, we reviewed their updated Emergency Response Plan and went more in-depth into long-term flood mitigation plans. Impacted community members have reported feeling a much more cohesive sense of community with neighbors, and a deeper understanding of SPU’s work. Although this is not a tangible strategy, it is clear that stronger relationships are critical to climate change resilience. In Spring 2025, we focused exclusively on impacts from sea-level rise. We surveyed 23 community members, we co-facilitated a focus group in which we prioritized most at-risk South Park sites and learned about nature-based solutions (NBS), and finally we convened a workshop in which community members self-selected by site and considered how these sites could be protected by NBS. Community learned a lot and felt inspired and empowered by the hands-on activities of “building” protective NBS. Participants learned about 9 different types of NBS and were able to select which NBS, either alone or in combination, seemed most suitable for specific sites.
|